Publications
Influence of Posture, Spinal Level, Gender and Muscle Activation on Biomechanical Properties of Lumbar Erector Spinae in Healthy Young Adults
Authors: Yueh-Ling Hsieh 1, Heng-Yi Lin 1, Andy Chien 1, 2
Affiliations:
- Department of Physical Therapy, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine and College of Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan
Journal: Medicina - January 2026, Volume 62, Issue 1, Article no. 159 (DOI: 10.3390/medicina62010159)
-
Field & Applications:
- Normatives
- Methodology
- Balance / Postural control
- Musculoskeletal health
Background and Objectives: This study set out to better understand how posture, spinal level, gender and muscle activation influence the biomechanical properties of the lumbar erector spinae (LES) in healthy young adults. We aimed to measure how these factors influence LES tone, stiffness, and damping using a myotonometry device.
Materials and Methods: Thirty healthy young adults (14 males, 16 females; aged 20–25 years) were evaluated at bilateral L3–L5 levels in prone, unsupported sitting, and standing positions, both under relaxed conditions and during submaximal isometric lumbar extension. The myotonometer measured LES tone (Hz), stiffness (N/m), and damping (logarithmic decrement). For each outcome, a mixed-model repeated-measures ANOVA was conducted with Gender as a between-subject factor and Posture, Level, and Action (relaxed vs. contracted) as within-subject factors (Bonferroni-adjusted α = 0.0167).
Results: Posture produced the most significant and consistent effects on all properties—stiffness, tone, and damping (p < 0.0167)—with sitting and standing generally increasing stiffness and tone compared to prone, and sitting showing the highest values. Gender significantly impacted stiffness and tone (p < 0.0167), with males showing higher values. Spinal level also significantly influenced damping, stiffness, and tone (all p < 0.0167), with differences more apparent in females. Significant interactions included the influence of Posture × Gender on tone and damping (p < 0.0167), and of Posture × Action on stiffness and tone (p < 0.0167), alongside a strong three-way interaction for Level × Action × Posture across all outcomes, suggesting posture-related responses depend on activation state and spinal level.
Conclusions: LES biomechanical properties are strongly affected by posture and further modulated by muscle activation, gender, and spinal level. These results support the creation of posture- and gender-specific reference values and underscore the value of dynamic, posture-specific myotonometer-based assessments for paraspinal muscle evaluation and clinical planning.
Keywords: lumbar erector spinae, muscle biomechanical properties, stiffness, tone, damping, posture, gender, spinal level, paraspinal muscle assessment
This study demonstrates that the biomechanical properties of the lumbar erector spinae are strongly influenced by posture, with stiffness, tone, and damping differing across prone, sitting, and standing positions. Posture exerted the greatest effect on LES mechanics, while gender and lumbar segment also showed significant main effects, indicating that these factors should be considered when establishing reference values or comparing groups. Overall, these findings support the development of posture- and gender-specific normative data for the assessment of lumbar muscle function.