Publications
Intra- and inter-session reliability of the MyotonPRO in measuring the biomechanical and viscoelastic properties of the knee extensor and flexor muscles
Authors: Erhan Secer 1, Kazim Bayram 2, Derya Ozer Kaya 3, 4
Affiliations:
- Manisa Celal Bayar University, Vocational School of Health Services, Department of Health Care Services, Manisa, Turkiye
- Kapadokya University, School of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Nevsehir, Turkiye
- Izmir Katip Celebi University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Izmir, Turkiye
- Izmir Katip Celebi University, Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Research and Application Center, Izmir, Turkiye
Journal: BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation - May 2026 (DOI: 10.1186/s13102-026-01742-5)
-
Field & Applications:
- Reliability
- Sport
- Musculoskeletal health
- This study contributes to the understanding of myotonometry as a reproducible tool, providing a foundation for its potential application in follow-up assessments within musculoskeletal rehabilitation and therapeutic evaluation.
Background: The MyotonPRO is a widely used, safe, and non-invasive digital device for assessing muscle biomechanical and viscoelastic properties. This study aimed to determine the intra- and inter-session reliability of the MyotonPRO in measuring the biomechanical and viscoelastic properties of the knee extensor and flexor muscles.
Methods: Eighty-four young male recreational athletes, with a mean age of 21.42 ± 1.37 years, participated in a four-stage repeated-measure study. Both sessions followed the same protocol: rectus femoris (RF) and biceps femoris (BF) measurements were taken twice per side and averaged, with a 30-min interval between sets. Two different intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) models were used: ICC3,1 (two-way mixed effects, absolute agreement) for intra-session reliability and ICC2,1 (two-way random effects, absolute agreement) for inter-session reliability. Standard error of measurement (SEM) was calculated using SEM = SDpooled x √(1-ICC). The minimal detectable change (MDC95) was calculated using the formula MDC95 = 1.96 × √2 × SEM. Bland–Altman plots were generated to visually represent the agreement between the two sessions, complementing the ICC analysis.
Results: The MyotonPRO demonstrated high to excellent intra-session reliability across all measured properties (tone, stiffness, elasticity, relaxation time, and creep) for both the RF (ICCs ≥ .95, ranging from .95 to .99; SEM: 0.01 to 6.14; MDC95: 0.04 to 17.03) and the BF (ICCs ≥ .97, ranging from .97 to .99; SEM: 0.02 to 5.27; MDC95: 0.05 to 14.62). The MyotonPRO demonstrated excellent inter-session reliability across all measured properties for both the RF (ICCs ≥ .96, ranging from .96 to .99; SEM: 0.02 to 4.38; MDC95: 0.05 to 12.14) and the BF (ICCs ≥ .94, ranging from .94 to .99; SEM: 0.02 to 5.17; MDC95: 0.07 to 14.54). The Bland–Altman analysis confirmed near agreement for all measured properties across sessions 1 and 2 for both the RF and BF. The limits of agreement encompassed most data points, and the overall systematic mean bias was negligible, remaining close to zero.
Conclusions: This study establishes the MyotonPRO as a highly reliable instrument for assessing muscle properties, evidenced by excellent intra-session and inter-session consistency across all measured biomechanical and viscoelastic properties. The negligible systematic bias indicates high temporal measurement stability, supporting the potential utility of myotonometry for monitoring changes in muscle mechanical properties in longitudinal assessments.
Keywords: hamstring muscle, quadriceps muscle, muscle tone, reliability, stiffness, elasticity
This study demonstrates that the MyotonPRO device is a highly reliable and clinically stable instrument for assessing the biomechanical and viscoelastic properties of the RF and BF within the specific context of young, healthy male recreational athletes. Across all measured properties, the device demonstrated favorable intra-session consistency, suggesting high precision within a single testing environment for this participant group. Furthermore, inter-session reliability appeared consistent, supporting the device’s stability for repeated measurements obtained on separate days. The Bland-Altman analysis corroborated these statistical findings, revealing minimal systematic bias and acceptable LoA between sessions for all properties. However, as the current study relied on a single experienced evaluator and a homogeneous sample, these findings likely represent an upper bound of reliability. Therefore, these results should not be generalized beyond similar populations or different clinical conditions without further validation. Future research involving female participants, older adults, and multiple raters is essential to establish the broader applicability and generalizability of these findings.